Abstract

A constructed vertical B2B software group at $20M revenue and 150 people, built from published benchmarks: gross margin near 60%, most revenue maintenance rather than subscription, EBITDA around breakeven. The document runs the operating bridge line by line to 78–82% gross margin, breaks it down by lever, shows the cash shape half-year by half-year, and prices entry and exit on the instruments each actually trades on. Nine sensitivities come before the engagement economics. Every figure is modelled, and every benefit is held to a baseline taken before the change — identified and realised reported as two numbers, never summed.

From the paper

Key findings

  1. Run against the six indicators, the constructed company shows the discount: ARR per head of about $115,000 against a ~$141k median, and product development at ~30% of revenue.

    ModelledSaaS Capital, Benchmarkit, SaaSRise benchmarks

  2. The financial cleanup takes billed services from 20% of revenue to 14%, and blended gross margin moves only from about 60% to about 63%.

    Modelled

  3. A third to a half of the product-development line is absorbed customer work: $2–3M of a $6M spend.

    Modelled

  4. Entry is priced on revenue: at 1.5x, between the ~1.1x IT-services and ~2.3–2.6x non-SaaS software medians, entry enterprise value is about $30M.

    ModelledAventis Advisors, private M&A medians

  5. Exit is priced on EBITDA: ~$5.5M at 10–11x, about $58M, deliberately below current private medians.

    ModelledSEG, Hampleton, Multiples.vc

  6. If the engineering baseline is understated by 20%, the largest line in the bridge is mis-sized and EBITDA arrives about a year later.

    Modelled

Inside · The value bridge, from the case
The value bridge

Modelled · central case · $M enterprise value

$30M
Entry EV1.5x revenue
+$28M
EBITDA created~$5.5M at ~10.5x
~$58M
Exit EV10–11x EBITDA

~1.9x on enterprise value, before fees and structure.

Revenue growth in the bridge sits above the central case as headroom; it is not summed.

What’s inside
  1. 1
    About This Model

    Why the discount is easy to assert and hard to picture, and how the model is constructed.

  2. 2
    The Company: Entrenched, Growing, Worth Less Every Year

    The entry profile, line by line from published benchmarks, and the six indicators run against it.

  3. 3
    Why the Cleanup Misses

    The cleanup succeeds on its own terms and gross margin still stops at 63%.

  4. 4
    The Operating Bridge: 60% to 80% Gross Margin

    Every line with its mechanism, the lever decomposition, and the cash shape half-year by half-year.

  5. 5
    Enterprise Value: Entry to Exit

    Entry priced on revenue, exit priced on EBITDA, and the sensitivity grid between them.

  6. 6
    Nine Sensitivities to Run First

    The ways the case breaks, each read as an outcome, before any base case is believed.

  7. 7
    Illustrative Engagement Economics

    The delivery team on the company’s books, the fee as non-recurring cost, carry against the baseline.

  8. 8
    One Starting Move

    Run your own numbers into the entry profile, then run the three-pile sort.

Read it now

Read the full case.

I am a (optional)

It opens as soon as you submit. Your email is used for this, and for the notes only if you tick the box. Privacy notice.